2026 OpenClaw Docker Network Triage Checklist
When the CLI Cannot Reach the Gateway—Compose, Bind & Namespaces

About 22 min read · MACCOME

Teams running OpenClaw on Docker Compose rarely fail because images cannot be pulled. They fail because Gateway logs look fine while browsers or the CLI report connection refused, failed WebSocket handshakes, or token errors—often due to listen addresses (bind), port publishing, and whether the CLI shares the Gateway network namespace, not the model API key. This article provides six on-call symptom classes, two matrices for “not running” vs “running but unroutable,” a bind/firewall/publish map, copy-paste diagnostics, a six-step runbook, and three log KPIs. Pair it with the Docker production runbook, doctor post-install triage, and Kubernetes probe guide: production answers how to deploy; this answers why containers cannot see each other or the host the way you think.

Six patterns that masquerade as token bugs

The control plane combines Gateway WebSocket/HTTP with CLI / Control UI, plus multiple containers, custom bridges, and network_mode: service:.... Without layered triage, teams churn across .openclaw files without checking whether the listener is reachable from the CLI namespace.

  1. Loopback-only listens: Gateway binds 127.0.0.1 inside the container; the host reaches it via published ports, yet another service in the same compose file resolves a different path.
  2. CLI and Gateway in different namespaces: the CLI resolves gateway:18789 via bridge DNS while Gateway only exposes loopback to the shared service stack—classic “works once, breaks after restart.”
  3. Stale published ports: host curl intermittently succeeds while in-container probes fail after a rolling upgrade leaves old NAT rules.
  4. Host firewall vs docker0 forwarding: browser on localhost OK, CLI container not OK.
  5. Reverse proxies missing WebSocket upgrades: handshake errors mistaken for Gateway crashes (see the systemd + Tunnel guide).
  6. Dual-stack quirks: ::1 or bad AAAA records on slim images.

Track these on the same change ticket as volumes, image digests, and health checks from production: reachability vs version correctness.

Maintain a one-page network topology in the compose repo: which services sit on which network, who publishes ports, and how dev laptops vs CI probe the stack. DNS on custom networks differs from the default bridge; when service names fail, run getent hosts or nslookup inside the container before blaming OpenClaw.

Table 1: Not running vs running but unroutable

Always run official doctor and gateway status first (see the post-install guide). Do not rotate tokens before you know a listener exists.

SignalLikely classFirst actionAnti-pattern
No Gateway container or CrashLoopNot updocker logs, OOM, probes killing podsEndless pull without resource checks
Running but no ss listener insideConfig/bind failureCheck OPENCLAW_GATEWAY_BIND and compose command vs docsEditing host /etc/hosts only
Listener OK, CLI wget failsCross-namespace routingConsider network_mode: "service:openclaw-gateway"Blind 0.0.0.0 without threat modeling
Host browser fails, container succeedsPublish / proxyValidate ports:, VPN, PAC filesDisabling TLS randomly

Table 2: Bind, publish, and firewall (Docker-specific)

Align with official gateway.bind values such as loopback, lan, tailnet, and auto; compose must also state who publishes ports.

GoalBind / env intentCompose notesSecurity
Local laptop onlyLoopback-first; host hits published port127.0.0.1:18789:18789Do not assume other compose services inherit loopback reachability
CLI tightly coupled to GatewayShare the network stacknetwork_mode: "service:openclaw-gateway"Shared port space—avoid duplicate binds
LAN debugginglan or equivalentBind 0.0.0.0 vs specific NIC explicitlyPair with upstream firewall rules
Tunnel / reverse proxyGateway loopback; TLS at edgeSplit networks; verify WebSocket pass-throughNo naked admin ports on the public Internet
bash
# 1) Host: is the port actually published?
docker compose ps
curl -sv --max-time 2 http://127.0.0.1:18789/  || true

# 2) Inside gateway container
docker compose exec openclaw-gateway sh -lc 'ss -lntp 2>/dev/null || netstat -lntp'

# 3) From CLI container (rename services)
docker compose exec openclaw-cli sh -lc 'wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://openclaw-gateway:18789/ || echo FAIL'

# 4) Inspect effective compose
docker compose config | sed -n '1,200p'
warning

Heads-up: Community reports tie “CLI cannot reach Gateway” to compose files that never put the CLI in the Gateway network namespace. Prove the command block on a test stack before merging to production.

Six-step runbook

If install paths are unclear, start with the three-platform install guide.

  1. Freeze compose: commit Gateway, CLI (if any), volumes, and env to Git.
  2. Run doctor and gateway status: align versions and token file cardinality.
  3. Classify with table 1: for Running containers, inspect listeners and cross-container probes.
  4. Adjust bind and network_mode using table 2: one variable at a time; capture outputs.
  5. If behind tunnel/proxy: verify Upgrade headers and path rewrites before touching Gateway TLS knobs.
  6. Handoff note: document listen triple, service names, namespace sharing, and one successful probe snippet.

Three log and alert KPIs

Compatible with HTTP probes from the Kubernetes health-check article when you promote the same stack to orchestration.

  1. Listen triple: container ss local address, process name, compose service—any delta needs a ticket.
  2. Cross-namespace probe buckets: success vs timeout vs DNS failure are different root causes.
  3. Published port consistency: docker port vs iptables NAT after rollouts—stale chains still bite in 2026.

Tag Gateway logs for handshake failures separately from upstream 429/5xx; if the latter dominates, pivot to the provider failover guide.

If HTTP probes target loopback while user traffic enters from another interface, you can see all-green probes with all-red users; align probe URLs with the bind policy from table 2 before blaming a release.

Why laptops alone struggle as long-lived control planes

Docker Desktop sleep, VPN toggles, and local proxies change how localhost resolves. Production-style automation needs repeatable listen policies, audited compose revisions, and stable host boundaries. Ad-hoc laptops also rarely deliver multi-region egress with bare-metal isolation, which conflicts with always-on Gateway expectations.

For teams that need a reachable, on-call control plane, hosting Gateway on professional cloud Macs usually beats fragile personal hardware. MACCOME provides Mac Mini M4 / M4 Pro bare-metal nodes across Singapore, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, US East, and US West. After network triage, pair SSH vs VNC with the help center, then finalize rental rates and regional pages.

Pilot on a dedicated test host, archive logs, then promote to the shared compose repo—avoid tribal network_mode knowledge.

Any temporary 0.0.0.0 bind needs a documented rollback and exposure review; triage aims to align who should see the control plane with namespace design, not to maximize listen scope.

FAQ

How is this different from the Docker production runbook?

Production covers images, volumes, and rollouts; this covers reachability. Use the help center plus the production runbook together.

Does the same matrix apply on WSL2?

Same order of operations, different localhost forwarding—stack the WSL2 triage article on top.

Where should I read about regions and rental terms?

If Gateway moves to a cloud Mac, align with the multi-region guide and rental rates before locking SSH egress.